From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mardiros v. Ghaly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Baisley, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff's responses to designated items in defendants' demand for a bill of particulars were sufficient. The court's order denying defendants' motion for reargument is not appealable (see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 A.D.2d 214).


Summaries of

Mardiros v. Ghaly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Mardiros v. Ghaly

Case Details

Full title:KAROUZIN MARDIROS, Respondent, v. NABIL GHALY et al., Appellants. (Appeal…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 927

Citing Cases

Weichert v. Kimber

Because plaintiff did not make a timely motion to strike defendant's demand for a bill of particulars, he may…

Evans v. Senkowski

New York law is clear that there is no procedural vehicle for appeal of a motion to reargue. Falci v.…