From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marchand v. Capone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs' motion is granted.

Where a medical malpractice action accrues during an injured plaintiff's infancy, CPLR 208 permits the applicable Statute of Limitations to be tolled for a maximum of up to 10 years from the accrual of the claim ( see, CPLR 208; Matter of Daniel J. v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 77 N.Y.2d 630). Although a medical malpractice claim ordinarily accrues when the alleged act of malpractice is committed (CPLR 214-a), "a cause of action * * * premised on faulty prenatal care and consequent injuries accrues at live birth" ( LaBello v Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp., 85 N.Y.2d 701, 704). Accordingly, this action to recover damages for injuries which the infant plaintiff sustained as a result of the alleged failure to properly monitor his mother's labor did not accrue until his birth on July 16, 1982. Since the action was commenced on July 16, 1992, 10 years after the infant plaintiff's birth, it is not time barred, and the affirmative defenses based upon the Statute of Limitations should be dismissed. Rosenblatt, J.P., Hart, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marchand v. Capone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Marchand v. Capone

Case Details

Full title:EMILE MARCHAND et al., Appellants, v. ANTHONY J. CAPONE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

Maietta v. Penzer

The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal…

Ciceron v. Jamaica Hospital

While we agree with the dismissal of the remaining causes of action, we find that the fourth cause of action,…