From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

March v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
May 22, 2020
No. 3:17-CV-189-DCLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:17-CV-189-DCLC-HBG

05-22-2020

PERRY AVRAM MARCH, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, ARAMARK CORRECTION SERVICES, LLC, JANE AMONETT, TONY BELL, JEFFREY PEMPEIT, and UNNAMED PERSONS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith, this pro se prisoner's complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Defendant Amonett's pending motion for extension of deadlines [Doc. 47] is DENIED as moot. Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

s/ Clifton L. Corker

United States District Judge ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT

s/ John L. Medearis

CLERK OF COURT


Summaries of

March v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
May 22, 2020
No. 3:17-CV-189-DCLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)
Case details for

March v. Aramark Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PERRY AVRAM MARCH, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, ARAMARK CORRECTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

No. 3:17-CV-189-DCLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)