From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marcano v. 100-120 Hugh Grant Circle Realty, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2021
198 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14485 Index No. 305023/14 Case No. 2020-03367

10-26-2021

William MARCANO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 100–120 HUGH GRANT CIRCLE REALTY, LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents, Lillian Blechner, Defendant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Greg Freedman of counsel), for appellant. O'Connor, O'Connor, Hintz & Deveney, LLP, Melville (Eileen Baumgartner of counsel), for respondents.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Greg Freedman of counsel), for appellant.

O'Connor, O'Connor, Hintz & Deveney, LLP, Melville (Eileen Baumgartner of counsel), for respondents.

Gische, J.P., Webber, Mazzarelli, Shulman, Pitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered on or about February 25, 2020, which granted defendants 100–120 Hugh Grant Circle Realty, LLC and JSMD Food Corp.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleged that he sustained personal injuries when he slipped and fell as a result of snow/ice on or near the parking driveway of defendants’ supermarket. Defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment through their expert meteorologist, who concluded that climatological data showed that the last measurable weather event was 19 days prior to plaintiff's accident, there was no snow or ice present in undisturbed, untreated, exposed areas for at least 11 days prior to plaintiff's accident, and ice and snow would not have been present at the location for at least 85 hours prior to the accident (see Daley v. Janel Tower, L.P., 89 A.D.3d 408, 409, 931 N.Y.S.2d 865 [1st Dept. 2011] ; Perez v. Canale, 50 A.D.3d 437, 855 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1st Dept. 2008] ).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. His argument that snow and ice might have accumulated from earlier storms, or from melting and refreezing snow not properly removed by defendants, was speculative and refuted by the climatological records (see Colon v. 36 Rivington St., Inc., 107 A.D.3d 508, 508–509, 968 N.Y.S.2d 23 [1st Dept. 2013] ; Perez, 50 A.D.3d at 437, 855 N.Y.S.2d 488 ).


Summaries of

Marcano v. 100-120 Hugh Grant Circle Realty, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2021
198 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Marcano v. 100-120 Hugh Grant Circle Realty, LLC

Case Details

Full title:William MARCANO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 100–120 HUGH GRANT CIRCLE REALTY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 891