From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marcado v. Pa. Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-2932 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-2932.

October 14, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2010, after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, and having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED ;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability, and a certificate is therefore NOT GRANTED.

For the record, the following items in the Report and Recommendation were incorrect, but they have no bearing on its legal conclusions: (a) on page 2, ¶ 7, line 1, February 1, 1998, should be February 1, 1988; (b) on page 2, ¶ 9, line 1, June 18, 1990, should be June 18, 1991; (c) on page 5, ¶ 24, line 2, "more than two" should be "less than two"; and (d) on page 5, last paragraph, December 23, 1998, should be December 29, 1993.


Summaries of

Marcado v. Pa. Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-2932 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Marcado v. Pa. Board of Probation Parole

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL MARCADO, Petitioner, v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-2932 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2010)