From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marascio v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 9, 2013
NO. PD-0427-12 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

NO. PD-0427-12 NO. PD-0428-12 NO. PD-0429-12

01-09-2013

ERIC REED MARASCIO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam . Keasler, and Hervey, J.J., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(D) because the petition exceeds 15 pages.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order. Do Not Publish.


Summaries of

Marascio v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 9, 2013
NO. PD-0427-12 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Marascio v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC REED MARASCIO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

NO. PD-0427-12 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 9, 2013)