Opinion
2:21-cv-02220-JAD-VCF
04-05-2022
SAM MARALAN, In Pro Per Plaintiff. Tye Hanseen Attorneys for Defendant Wynn Las Vegas.
SAM MARALAN, In Pro Per Plaintiff.
Tye Hanseen Attorneys for Defendant Wynn Las Vegas.
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Jennnifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge.
Plaintiff Sam Maralan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wynn Las Vegas dba XS (“Wynn”) (collectively, the “Parties”), respectfully submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order, as follows:
1. On March 24, 2022, Wynn filed a Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiffs Complaint [Dkt. No. 21];
2. On March 24, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff's Opposition filed within 14-days of the filing [Dkt. No. 22];
3. Plaintiffs Opposition to Wynn's Motion to Dismiss is currently due on April 7, 2022 and Wynn's Reply is due April 14, 2022;
4. The Parties hereby agree and stipulate to extend Plaintiff's Opposition date and Wynn's Reply date by three (3) weeks; and 5. The proposed deadline for Plaintiffs Opposition shall be April 28, 2022 and Wynn's Reply shall be May 5, 2022.
6. Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, this is the first stipulation for extension to submit Opposition and Reply papers to Wynn's Motion to Dismiss. The basis for the extension is to allow the Parties additional time to prepare responsive papers.
JOINT STIPULATION
1. WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Opposition to Wynn's Motion to Dismiss shall be due April 28, 2022;
2. WHEREAS, Wynn's Reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due May 5, 2022.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION OF AUTHORIZED FILING
I hereby attest that I have received authorization for the electronic signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature () within this e-filed document.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [23] and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiffs Opposition to Wynn's Motion to Dismiss is due April 28, 2022; and Wynn's reply brief is due May 5, 2022.