From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maracina v. Schirrmeister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 27, 1989
152 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 27, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.).


By memorandum decision and order dated November 29, 1984, this court granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and ordered an assessment of damages in Supreme Court ( 105 A.D.2d 672). Jury selection was completed on April 25, 1989, and the case was assigned for trial to Justice Carol E. Huff. On May 1, 1989, before there had been any opening statements, or other proceedings before the jury, the court orally granted a motion to dismiss the complaint. Three days later, on May 4, 1989, the court entered a written order, reading as follows: "Upon the Court's own motion after trial, settle order/judgment [sic]". As noted, no trial had ever taken place.

The respondent cites no authority, and indeed, none exists, to support the Trial Judge's disregard of the earlier order of this court. Trial courts are without authority to vacate or modify orders of the Appellate Division, or to reverse holdings of this court.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Maracina v. Schirrmeister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 27, 1989
152 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Maracina v. Schirrmeister

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD P. MARACINA, Individually and Doing Business as MARACINA, LASSIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 27, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
544 N.Y.S.2d 13

Citing Cases

Wiener v. Wiener

The Supreme Court "erred in failing to adhere to the terms of this Court's remittitur" ( Campbell v.…

Webb v. Zogaria

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without…