From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maphis v. Pegram

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1890
12 S.E. 235 (N.C. 1890)

Opinion

September Term, 1890.

Probate of Deed — Registration.

The case of Buggy Co. v. Pegram, 102 N.C. 540, is decisive of this case, and this Court will not consider the questions involved therein a second time.

ACTION heard at October Term, 1890, of FORSYTH, by McCorkle, J., upon the complaint and answer.

J. L. Patterson for plaintiff.

No counsel contra.


The material facts in this case are the same as in Buggy Co. v. Pegram, 102 N.C. 540, and the same questions are involved.


This case brings in question a second time the validity of the probate of the deed held to be sufficient in Buggy Co. v. Pegram, 102 N.C. 540. That case is authority directly in point, and must govern the present one. Notwithstanding the earnest and elaborate argument of the appellant's counsel, we approve it as correctly decided, and do not feel called upon to add a word to what is there said.

Affirmed.

(506)


Summaries of

Maphis v. Pegram

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1890
12 S.E. 235 (N.C. 1890)
Case details for

Maphis v. Pegram

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MAPHIS v. T. H. PEGRAM ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1890

Citations

12 S.E. 235 (N.C. 1890)
107 N.C. 505

Citing Cases

Buggy Co. v. Pegram

Error. Reversed. Cited: Maphis v. Pegram, 107 N.C. 505; Long v. Crews, 113 N.C. 257; Barcello v. Hapgood, 118…