From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mapanda v. Kuhn

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
1:20-cv-01676-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01676-EPG

10-03-2022

BEATRICE MAPANDA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARK EDWARD KUHN, et al, Defendants.


ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (ECF NO. 24)

On September 30, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (ECF No. 24). In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mapanda v. Kuhn

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
1:20-cv-01676-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Mapanda v. Kuhn

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE MAPANDA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARK EDWARD KUHN, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01676-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)