From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maoz v. Aple Shop

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 27, 2022
22-CV-2039 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 27, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2039 (LTS)

06-27-2022

ODED MAOZ, Plaintiff, v. APLE SHOP, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated April 5, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On April 19, 2022, the Clerk of Court received notice that the April 5, 2022, order was not deliverable to the address provided by Plaintiff because the address was insufficient. As of the filing of this action, Plaintiff has not contacted the court to update his address. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maoz v. Aple Shop

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 27, 2022
22-CV-2039 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Maoz v. Aple Shop

Case Details

Full title:ODED MAOZ, Plaintiff, v. APLE SHOP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 27, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2039 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 27, 2022)