From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manzo v. Ajello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

February, 1926.


Order granting plaintiff's motion to open her default in serving complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew said motion upon payment of costs within ten days. Plaintiff, in her application, fails to set forth any fact showing a meritorious cause of action. This was necessary to entitle plaintiff to the relief sought. ( Titus v. Halsted, 209 App. Div. 66; Heischober v. Polishook, 152 id. 193; Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. Alexander, 200 id. 164.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Manzo v. Ajello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Manzo v. Ajello

Case Details

Full title:LUIGIA MANZO, Respondent, v. MICHELE AJELLO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

216 App. Div. 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Lunghino v. Marine Trust Company of Buffalo

If the relief plaintiff is seeking herein is to be granted he must not only excuse his default but he must…

Blasser v. Morrisania Milk Co.

We are of the opinion that the order made was improper. ( Titus v. Halsted, 209 App. Div. 66; Manzo v.…