From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Many Iron Works v. Kay

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 4, 1933
151 So. 253 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 1261.

December 4, 1933.

Appeal from District Court, Parish of Vernon; Hal A. Burgess, Judge.

Action by the Many Iron Works against R.E. Kay. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

S.I. Foster, of Leesville, for appellant.

Fraser Carroll, of Many, for appellee.


In this case, citation was properly served on defendant and so was notice of provisional seizure, after the sheriff had seized the property.

A preliminary default was entered April 17, 1933, and confirmed April 20, 1933. The confirmation was in time. Code Prac. art. 312; Taney v. Meilleur, 35 La. Ann. 117. The proceedings were therefore legal and regular.

There is no evidence in the record, but the presumption is that the judgment was rendered on sufficient evidence and that it is correct. Burbank v. Succession of Barton, 117 La. 262, 41 So. 567; Wilson v. Ivy Lodge, 116 La. 537, 40 So. 864; Pepper v. Smith, 4 La. App. 370.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Many Iron Works v. Kay

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 4, 1933
151 So. 253 (La. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Many Iron Works v. Kay

Case Details

Full title:MANY IRON WORKS v. KAY

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Dec 4, 1933

Citations

151 So. 253 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing Cases

Evans v. Hamner

The next day being Sunday, the only full legal day that elapsed before the day on which the judgment by…