From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuszewski v. Keele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 28, 1939
257 App. Div. 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

June 28, 1939.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Upon the facts as found by the referee, the judgment restraining the defendant from competing with the plaintiffs was rightly granted. ( American Ice Co. v. Meckel, 109 App. Div. 93; Von Bremen v. MacMonnies, 200 N.Y. 41.) The referee adopted the correct rule for the admeasurement of damages. ( Present v. Glaser, 225 App. Div. 23.) All concur. (The judgment enjoins defendant from operating a gasoline station in competition with a station sold to plaintiffs by defendant.)


Summaries of

Manuszewski v. Keele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 28, 1939
257 App. Div. 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Manuszewski v. Keele

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD MANUSZEWSKI and LEO MANUSZEWSKI, Respondents, v. CHANCY KEELE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Flexitized, Inc. v. National Flexitized Corp.

der which defendants promised to use their best efforts to sell plaintiffs' product and also promised not to…