From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manukyan v. Cach, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2012
Case No. CV 12-08356 RGK (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-08356 RGK (JCx)

12-18-2012

Manukyan v. Cach, LLC et al.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Sharon L. Williams (Not Present)¦Not Reported ¦N/A ¦ +--------------------------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk ¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Not Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Order to Show Cause as to Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendants Chase Bank, N.A.; GE Capital Retail Bank; DB Servicing Corp.; and Midland Credit Management

On September 27, 2012 Plaintiff Izabell Manukyan ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint against ten defendants ("Defendants") for violations of fair credit reporting and debt collection statutes. Six Defendants moved for dismissal, which was granted as to those Moving Defendants on December 11, 2012, leaving Chase Bank, N.A.; GE Capital Retail Bank; DB Servicing Corp.; and Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Remaining Defendants") as the remaining Defendants in this action.

The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before January 4, 2013 why Defendants Chase Bank, N.A.; GE Capital Retail Bank; DB Servicing Corp.; and Midland Credit Management should not also be dismissed from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________ : ___________

Initials of Preparer ___________


Summaries of

Manukyan v. Cach, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2012
Case No. CV 12-08356 RGK (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Manukyan v. Cach, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Manukyan v. Cach, LLC et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

Citations

Case No. CV 12-08356 RGK (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Smith v. 9W Halo W. OpCo L.P.

Rule 8 requires a plaintiff to differentiate allegations against multiple defendants. See Dunson v. Cordis…