From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manufacturers Traders v. Int'l Packaging

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.

Present — Lawton, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff brought this action to enforce general guaranty agreements given by defendants George N. Smith and George V. Smith guaranteeing a loan of $92,900 from plaintiff to defendant International Packaging, Inc. Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in plaintiff's favor.

The guaranty agreements entered into by the Smiths provide that they are not entitled to notice of default on the part of the primary obligor. The guaranty agreements also provide that each guarantor waives the right to assert any defense based upon a claim of laches.

Finally, the argument of the Smiths that there is a triable issue of fact because plaintiff unjustifiably impaired their right of recourse against the principal obligor (see, UCC 3-606 [b]) is without merit. UCC 3-606 (1) (b) provides that the holder discharges any party to an instrument to the extent that, without such party's consent, the holder "unjustifiably impairs any collateral for the instrument given by or on behalf of the party or any person against whom he has a right of recourse". That section concerns "instrument[s]" that are defined by UCC 3-102 (1) (e) as "negotiable instrument[s]". Because the guaranty agreements were not negotiable instruments, no triable issue of fact exists regarding the impairment of any right of recourse against the principal obligor.


Summaries of

Manufacturers Traders v. Int'l Packaging

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Manufacturers Traders v. Int'l Packaging

Case Details

Full title:MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 91

Citing Cases

Platte River Ins. Co. v. Khan

Contrary to the Hussain Defendants' assertions, the Indemnity Agreements are not negotiable instruments, and…

Port Distributing Corp. v. Pflaumer

Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code, of course, applies only to negotiable instruments, and, ordinarily,…