From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Martin Lithographics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 22, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact (see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851). Further, despite the appellant's contentions, we find that he failed to present evidence sufficient to raise triable issues of fact. Therefore, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Martin Lithographics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Martin Lithographics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. MARTIN LITHOGRAPHICS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

Dombrowski v. County of Nassau

eview of the record demonstrates that the various documentary materials submitted by the defendant…