From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuela Cancino Contreras Morales v. City of Delano

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1203-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1203-AWI-JLT.

February 23, 2011

MARK PACHOWICZ (SBN 138108), LANNY M. TRON (SBN 135339), Law Offices of Mark Pachowicz, APLC, Camarillo, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MANUELA CANCINO CONTRERAS MORALES and R.A.M., a minor.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING PHOTOGRAPHS AND AUDIO CD OF AUTOPSY (Doc. 34)


TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The parties having stipulated thereto and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. All documents produced by the County of Kern in response to Plaintiff Manuela Cancino Morales' September 28, 2009 subpoena requesting:
"1) The 14 photographs of the deceased, Mr. Ruben Mesa Morales that were listed but not provided pursuant to the January 5, 2010 letter from Barry M. Klein, Supervising Deputy District Attorney to Mark Pachowicz, and
2) The Audio CD of Autopsy photographs of the deceased, Mr. Ruben Mesa Morales, that was listed but not provided pursuant to the January 5, 2010 letter from Barry M. Klein, Supervising Deputy District Attorney, to Mark Pachowicz", (collectively, the documents/items contained in #1 and # 2 are referred to as "the records")
Shall be subject to the following orders:
a. The records shall not be copied or disseminated outside of any attorney's office except for review by retained experts or parties to this action.
b. The only persons who shall be authorized to view the records will be the involved attorneys, the attorneys' office staff, retained experts and/or parties to this action and the Court and Court staff.
c. The contents of the records shall not be discussed with or disseminated to, either verbally or in any written form, any person that is not one of the involved attorneys, the attorneys' office staff, retained experts and/or parties to this action and the Court and Court staff.
d. The records shall not be provided to the news media directly or indirectly in any form.
e. The records shall only be utilized in connection with this litigation and for no other purpose.
f. At the conclusion of this litigation, all records produced and any copies thereof, including exhibits to depositions, shall be returned to the offices of Kern County Counsel.
2. All personal information incorporated in the records, including but not limited to home addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and relatives' names, may be redacted. If the redacted portion is subsequently determined by this court or by stipulation to be relevant, the non-redacted relevant material will be produced.
3. Any person or persons violating this Order shall be subject to sanctions and costs of motion.
4. Any requests to the Court to seal the records must be made pursuant to Local Rule 140.
5. Nothing contained herein precludes the Court from making a determination about the admissibility of the records at the appropriate time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2011


Summaries of

Manuela Cancino Contreras Morales v. City of Delano

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1203-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Manuela Cancino Contreras Morales v. City of Delano

Case Details

Full title:MANUELA CANCINO CONTRERAS MORALES; R.A.M.; Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DELANO…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1203-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)