From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Manuel v. Stenson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 16, 2010
126 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-0248.

Submitted June 9, 2010.

Decided June 16, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 23583.

Michael Manuel, pro se.


{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, Michael Manuel, because although he challenges the court of appeals' November 10, 2009 judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus, he failed to file a timely appeal from that judgment. S.Ct.Prac. R. 2.2(A)(1). His amended motion for rehearing, whether construed as a motion for reconsideration or a Civ. R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, did not extend his time to appeal the judgment. State ex rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Autk, 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005, ¶ 1. Manuel cannot use Civ. R. 60(B) as a substitute for a timely appeal. Id.

Appeal dismissed.

BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Manuel v. Stenson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 16, 2010
126 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Manuel v. Stenson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. MANUEL, APPELLANT v. STENSON, APPELLEE. Page 53

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 16, 2010

Citations

126 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 2673

Citing Cases

State ex rel. McGrath v. McClelland

McGrath's Civ.R. 60(B) motions for relief from judgment did not extend his time to appeal the court of…

State ex rel. Andrews v. Chardon Police Dep't

The motion for reconsideration that Andrews filed in the court of appeals did not extend his time to appeal…