From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mantila v. Luca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2002
298 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-10770

Submitted October 2, 2002.

October 21, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated October 24, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Robert J. Cava, P.C., West Babylon, N.Y., for appellant.

Litman Litman, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey E. Litman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant's submission of a medical report prepared by the plaintiff's expert established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957; Forte v. Vaccaro, 175 A.D.2d 153). Although unsworn, the report constituted competent evidence since it was prepared by the plaintiff's physician (see Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 271).

The medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212[b]).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mantila v. Luca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2002
298 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Mantila v. Luca

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO MANTILA, respondent, v. VINCENT W. LUCA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

Tejerina v. Poncet

It is noted at the outset that defendants' proof submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment,…

Sherin v. Roda

Therefore, the Supreme Court should have granted the Lauers' motion for summary judgment. Roda and Gamble…