From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mantey v. Hamby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jun 11, 2013
No.: 3:13-cv-41 (VARLAN/GUYTON) (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:13-cv-41 (VARLAN/GUYTON)

06-11-2013

DAVID MANTEY, Plaintiff, v. GARY HAMBY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

On May 13, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return the service packets for defendants Gary Hamby and Robert Gibson within 20 days. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to return the completed service packets could jeopardize his prosecution of this action. Plaintiff has failed to return the service packets or otherwise respond to the order of this Court. Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, sua sponte, for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.

Thomas A. Varlan

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mantey v. Hamby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jun 11, 2013
No.: 3:13-cv-41 (VARLAN/GUYTON) (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Mantey v. Hamby

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MANTEY, Plaintiff, v. GARY HAMBY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:13-cv-41 (VARLAN/GUYTON) (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2013)