From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mansharamani v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 157582 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SC: 157582

02-04-2019

RITA MANSHARAMANI and KARUNA MANSHARAMANI, Plaintiffs, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices AGC: 17-2047; 17-2142 17-2203; 17-2837

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

CAVANAGH, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Mansharamani v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 157582 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Mansharamani v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:RITA MANSHARAMANI and KARUNA MANSHARAMANI, Plaintiffs, v. ATTORNEY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 4, 2019

Citations

SC: 157582 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)