From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Apr 9, 1924
263 S.W. 658 (Tex. Civ. App. 1924)

Opinion

No. 1085.

March 26, 1924. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1924.

Appeal from District Court, Orange County; A. D. Lipscomb, Special Judge.

On motion for rehearing. Overruled.

For former opinion, see 260 S.W. 307.

Howth O'Fiel, of Beaumont, for appellants.

Holland Holland, of Orange, for appellee.


Since the filing of our opinion on original submission in this case, appellants have filed a petition for certiorari, asking permission to bring up their bill of exception complaining of the action of the court in overruling their challenges to the jurors, wherein is set forth the full interrogation of the jurors on the issue of their qualification. This motion comes too late. After we have entered a judgment on the record as before us, we are not permitted, by the rules governing our court, to permit an amendment or correction or addition to the transcript. Woolley v. Nelson (Tex.Civ.App.) 250 S.W. 481.

Appellants' motion for rehearing, after being carefully reviewed by us, is in all things overruled.


Summaries of

Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Apr 9, 1924
263 S.W. 658 (Tex. Civ. App. 1924)
Case details for

Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co

Case Details

Full title:MANSFIELD et al. v. ORANGE INV. CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont

Date published: Apr 9, 1924

Citations

263 S.W. 658 (Tex. Civ. App. 1924)

Citing Cases

White v. White

Since the rendition of the opinion the appellant seeks by certiorari to include in the transcript exceptions…

Kentucky Oil Corp. v. McCandless

However, if the supplemental transcript tendered contained all the necessary proceedings to show that an…