From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mansfield v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 16, 2022
No. 19935-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

19935-21S

03-16-2022

Thomas Chadwick Mansfield & Kristi Lynn Mansfield Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On January 31, 2022, the parties filed a proposed stipulated decision for the Court's consideration. Upon review of the record, however, it appears that petitioners may have paid the tax liability for the 2018 tax year prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. If so, the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for the 2018 tax year is invalid and this Court lacks jurisdiction of this case. See Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527 (1985).

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before April 7, 2022, the parties shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. The Court will hold in abeyance the parties' proposed stipulated decision pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue in this case.


Summaries of

Mansfield v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 16, 2022
No. 19935-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Mansfield v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Chadwick Mansfield & Kristi Lynn Mansfield Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

No. 19935-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 16, 2022)