From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mansell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 17, 2020
292 So. 3d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-2816

04-17-2020

Theophilus Savalas MANSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Theophilus Savalas Mansell, Cocoa, pro se. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Matthew Funderburk, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Theophilus Savalas Mansell, Cocoa, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Matthew Funderburk, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. We affirm Theophilus Savalas Mansell's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the $3 cost assessed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), as Mansell was not charged with a traffic infraction. See Sorenson v. State , 291 So.3d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 21, 2020).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LAMBERT, SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mansell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 17, 2020
292 So. 3d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Mansell v. State

Case Details

Full title:THEOPHILUS SAVALAS MANSELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 17, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)