Opinion
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-LJO-BAM PC
01-09-2012
DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. HUCHINS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
TWENTY DAY DEADLINE
On July 6, 2011, the Court ordered Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's sixth motion to compel, motion to stay the briefing schedule, motion for a sixty day extension of time to conduct discovery, and motion to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Defendants did not file a response or otherwise respond to the order. On July 27, 2011, the Court ordered that, within thirty days, defense counsel pay sanctions of $16.80 for Plaintiff's costs in bringing his fifth motion to compel and $6.24 for Plaintiff's costs in bringing the motion to determine the sufficiency of Defendant Hacker's objections. (ECF No. 65.) On September 22, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the order of the court and requested additional sanctions. Defendants have failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, within twenty days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall show cause why sanctions should not issue for Defendants' failure to comply with the orders of the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE