From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manos v. Speese

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 9, 1998
699 N.E.2d 96 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-1684.

September 9, 1998

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27, 1998, in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9) and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,


IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.

Thursday, September 10, 1998 MOTION DOCKET


Summaries of

Manos v. Speese

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 9, 1998
699 N.E.2d 96 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

Manos v. Speese

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Manos v. Speese

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 9, 1998

Citations

699 N.E.2d 96 (Ohio 1998)
699 N.E.2d 96

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Manos v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elecs

In fact, instead of immediately filing a protest with the board of elections following the transmittal of the…