From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manogna v. Fish

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 2, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-2644-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-CV-2644-M-BH

12-02-2019

DEVABHAKTUNI MANOGNA, Plaintiff, v. A. JOE FISH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, filed November 6, 2019 (doc. 3), is denied. By separate judgment, this action will be summarily dismissed based on the prior sanction order in Manogna Devabhaktuni v. Honorable David C. Godbey, No. 3:19-CV-2216-G (BT) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019).

SIGNED this 2nd day of December, 2019.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Manogna v. Fish

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 2, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-2644-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Manogna v. Fish

Case Details

Full title:DEVABHAKTUNI MANOGNA, Plaintiff, v. A. JOE FISH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-CV-2644-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2019)