From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mannings v. Hightower

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 13, 2007
CIV. ACTION NO. 2:02cv1246-ID (M.D. Ala. Mar. 13, 2007)

Opinion

CIV. ACTION NO. 2:02cv1246-ID.

March 13, 2007


ORDER


Before the court is the recommendation of the magistrate judge, filed February 23, 2007, to which no objections have been timely filed. Having carefully reviewed the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation, and finding no clear error, see United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983), it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that:

1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

2. Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law be and the same is hereby DENIED;

3. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims of excessive force against Defendants Leeposey Daniels and Anthony Gibson be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and

4. there being no remaining viable claims, the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.


Summaries of

Mannings v. Hightower

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 13, 2007
CIV. ACTION NO. 2:02cv1246-ID (M.D. Ala. Mar. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Mannings v. Hightower

Case Details

Full title:MARK MANNINGS, #167804, Plaintiff, v. ROY HIGHTOWER, WARDEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

CIV. ACTION NO. 2:02cv1246-ID (M.D. Ala. Mar. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Shinholster v. Rich

Indeed, It may be that a few smacks of a handcuffed inmate to "keep him in line" is constitutionally…