From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 29, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-006

04-29-2015

CLENNIE MANNING, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #14); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. #15); SUSTAINING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS HABEAS PETITION (DOC. #8); DISMISSING PETITION FOR "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" (DOC. #1) WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; TERMINATION ENTRY

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, in his April 6, 2015, Report and Recommendations, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing, Doc. #14, in its entirety.

Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendations, Doc. #15, having been electronically filed on April 28, 2015, are not only untimely, but they lack merit. The Court notes that, regardless of whether Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated, his claims are clearly barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Petitioner's Objections, Doc. #15, are therefore OVERRULED.

For the reasons set forth by Magistrate Judge Merz, the Court SUSTAINS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition, Doc. #8, and DISMISSES the Petition, Doc. #1, WITH PREJUDICE.

Given that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, further, that the Court's decision herein would not be debatable among reasonable jurists, and because any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, and is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Judgment will be entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Date: April 29, 2015

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Manning v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 29, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Manning v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CLENNIE MANNING, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 29, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2015)