From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1879
78 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1879)

Summary

In Manning v. Hogan (78 N.Y. 615, 616), an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, caused by the fall of a scaffold claimed to have been negligently constructed, it was said: "That the question of negligence in building the scaffold was for the jury, that it was not sufficient that there was enough of suitable material provided to build the scaffold.

Summary of this case from Hatton v. Hilton Bridge Construction Co.

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1879

Decided November 11, 1879

Samuel Hand for appellant.

John R. Dos Passos for respondent.


Per Curiam opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Manning v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1879
78 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1879)

In Manning v. Hogan (78 N.Y. 615, 616), an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, caused by the fall of a scaffold claimed to have been negligently constructed, it was said: "That the question of negligence in building the scaffold was for the jury, that it was not sufficient that there was enough of suitable material provided to build the scaffold.

Summary of this case from Hatton v. Hilton Bridge Construction Co.
Case details for

Manning v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MANNING, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . JOHN HOGAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 11, 1879

Citations

78 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1879)

Citing Cases

Remmers v. Est. of Wolf

Said judgment is therefore conclusively presumed to have been paid in full. Sec. 6796, R.S. 1889; Dreyer v.…

Hatton v. Hilton Bridge Construction Co.

But for the act or omission of the foreman in that regard, the defendant was responsible. In Manning v. Hogan…