From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Bowersox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2015
Case No. 4:11CV2060 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 4:11CV2060 RWS

03-27-2015

ARTHUR LEE MANNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability. I denied petitioner a certificate of appealability on March 19, 2015, when I denied his habeas petition. As petitioner's motion raises no new arguments that convince me my prior decision was in error, the motion will be denied. As I stated before, to grant a certificate of appealability, the Court must find a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 1997). A substantial showing is a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings. Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th Cir. 1994)). Because petitioner has not made such a showing, I will not issue a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability [#22] is denied.

/s/_________

RODNEY W. SIPPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 27th day of March, 2015.


Summaries of

Manning v. Bowersox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2015
Case No. 4:11CV2060 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Manning v. Bowersox

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR LEE MANNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. 4:11CV2060 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 27, 2015)