" (Cit.)' Mann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 308 S.E.2d 12) (1983). See also Whittington v. State, 184 Ga. App. 282 (4) ( 361 S.E.2d 211) (1987).
Furthermore, "`(a)ssuming . . . that there was a variance between the allegata and the probata in regard to the time of the commission of the crime, a motion for directed verdict was not the proper vehicle for obtaining relief. The (appellant) should have made a motion for continuance, postponement or recess if surprised by a time variance.' [Cit.]" Mann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 308 S.E.2d 12) (1983). See also Whittington v. State, 184 Ga. App. 282 (4) ( 361 S.E.2d 211) (1987).
The trial court correctly denied the motion for directed verdict of acquittal. Caldwell v. State, supra; Mann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 308 S.E.2d 12) (1983). 3. Lastly, appellant maintains the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross-examine a defense witness concerning bias without laying a proper foundation.
]" Campbell v. State, 240 Ga. 352, 356 ( 240 S.E.2d 828) (1977), cert. den., 439 U.S. 882 (1978). Accord Edgehill v. State, 253 Ga. 343 (3) ( 320 S.E.2d 176) (1984); Mann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 308 S.E.2d 12) (1983). See also Cherry v. State, 159 Ga. App. 75 (1) ( 282 S.E.2d 717) (1981).
As this court said in Redwing Carriers v. Knight, 143 Ga. App. 668, 673 ( 239 S.E.2d 686) (1977): "The proper procedure would have been to accept the offer of interview and then to seek any additional relief thought necessary." Accord Mann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 308 S.E.2d 12) (1983). We find no merit in this enumeration.