From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug 10, 2015
797 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 09–99017.

08-10-2015

Eric Owen MANN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent–Appellee.

Amy Kraus, Law Office of Amy B. Kraus, Cary S. Sandman, FPDAZ–Federal Public Defender's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. John Pressley Todd, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.


Amy Kraus, Law Office of Amy B. Kraus, Cary S. Sandman, FPDAZ–Federal Public Defender's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant.

John Pressley Todd, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Mann v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug 10, 2015
797 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Mann v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Eric Owen MANN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Aug 10, 2015

Citations

797 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Mann v. Ryan

A majority of the nonrecused active judges on our court subsequently voted to rehear the case en banc. Mann…