From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Oklahoma City Planing Mill Box Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
150 P. 460 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4578

Opinion Filed June 29, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, and assigns no reason for failure to do so, the appeal will be considered as abandoned, and under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), is dismissed.

(Syllabus by Brett, C.)

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge.

Action by the Oklahoma City Planing Mill Box Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against J. W. Mann. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Dismissed.

Ross Moss, for plaintiff in error.

John H. Shirk, for defendant in error.


This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by the defendant in error, Oklahoma City Planing Mill Box Manufacturing Company, against J. W. Mann, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal was filed in this court November 20, 1912, and the cause was on June 7, 1915, submitted on the record. Plaintiff in error has filed no brief, assigned no reason for not filing brief, and under these circumstances this court will consider the appeal as abandoned by the plaintiff in error, and the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Mann v. Oklahoma City Planing Mill Box Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
150 P. 460 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Mann v. Oklahoma City Planing Mill Box Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MANN v. OKLAHOMA CITY PLANING MILL BOX MFG. CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 29, 1915

Citations

150 P. 460 (Okla. 1915)
150 P. 460

Citing Cases

Tackett v. Bell

The brief filed by the defendant appears to reasonably sustain this assignment of error, and when, as in this…

Graham v. Kay

Both sides have appealed, each seeking to have the judgment rendered against him in the lower court reversed.…