From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Oct 7, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-325-J-34PDB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-325-J-34PDB

10-07-2015

TINA MANN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14; Report), entered on October 16, 2014. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Barksdale recommends that the Court grant summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") based on Plaintiff Tina Mann's failure to timely file her federal complaint and her failure to show extraordinary circumstances necessary to equitably toll the 60-day period to file such an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). See Report at 8. On October 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15; Objection). The Commissioner filed a response to the Objection on November 10, 2014. See Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16; Response). Accordingly, the matter is ripe for review.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).

Upon independent review of the Report, the Court will overrule the Objection and accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is OVERRULED.

2. Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

3. Defendant's Opposed Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and against Plaintiff, Tina Mann, and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 7th day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD

United States District Judge
Copies to: The Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Mann v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Oct 7, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-325-J-34PDB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Mann v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:TINA MANN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-325-J-34PDB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2015)