From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Cadillac Automobile Co. of Boston

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Sep 19, 1939
29 F. Supp. 495 (D. Mass. 1939)

Opinion

No. 254.

September 19, 1939.

Nathan A. Heller, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Joseph Wiggin, T.H. Stearns, James T. Connolly, and Walter R. Donovan, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.


Action by Harry S. Mann, trustee in bankruptcy of W.J. Pineau Company, Incorporated, against the Cadillac Automobile Company of Boston, to recover certain moneys alleged to have been paid by plaintiff's bankrupt to defendant. On defendant's motion for bill of particulars.

Motion denied.


The defendant has filed a motion for a bill of particulars in which inquiry is made with regard to six automobiles, the method of acquisition of said automobiles by the bankrupt, and inquiry as to the type of contracts under which the automobiles were acquired.

The bill of complaint discloses a demand for judgment for certain moneys paid by the plaintiff's bankrupt to the defendant. What the defendant seeks in its so-called bill of particulars is information that is properly the subject of interrogatories. Although it states that it seeks the information in order to enable it to properly prepare a responsive pleading and to prepare for trial, I am of the opinion that it can properly answer the plaintiff's complaint without the particulars that are sought to be elicited by its motion. The motion is therefore denied. See American LaFrance-Foamite Corporation v. American Oil Co., D.C., 25 F. Supp. 386.


Summaries of

Mann v. Cadillac Automobile Co. of Boston

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Sep 19, 1939
29 F. Supp. 495 (D. Mass. 1939)
Case details for

Mann v. Cadillac Automobile Co. of Boston

Case Details

Full title:MANN v. CADILLAC AUTOMOBILE CO. OF BOSTON. In re W.J. PINEAU CO., Inc

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Sep 19, 1939

Citations

29 F. Supp. 495 (D. Mass. 1939)

Citing Cases

Townsend v. Boston M.R.R.

This information may well be the subject of interrogatories after the parties are at issue. See Mann v.…