From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manko v. Broome

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
May 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 72125 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-02907 Index No. 20555/10 M137162

05-03-2012

Nella Manko, appellant, v. Bernard H. Broome, etc., et al., respondents.


, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

L. PRISCILLA HALL

SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 19, 2011, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to waive the motion filing fee.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.22[a][2]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 4, 2012, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Manko v. Broome

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
May 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 72125 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Manko v. Broome

Case Details

Full title:Nella Manko, appellant, v. Bernard H. Broome, etc., et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 72125 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)