From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manko v. Broome

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 8, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-02907 Index No. 20555/10 M141737

08-08-2012

Nella Manko, appellant, v. Bernard H. Broome, etc., et al., respondents.


, J.P.

RUTH C. BALKIN

RANDALL T. ENG

SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 19, 2011, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to waive the motion filing fee.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.22[a][2]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]) and prior order of this Court; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.

FLORIO, J.P., BALKIN, ENG and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Manko v. Broome

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 8, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Manko v. Broome

Case Details

Full title:Nella Manko, appellant, v. Bernard H. Broome, etc., et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)