From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mankie v. Rustin

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1205 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1205.

May 22, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2007, after the plaintiff, James Mankie, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and granting the plaintiff ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desire to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Mankie v. Rustin

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1205 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Mankie v. Rustin

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MANKIE, Plaintiff, v. RAMON RUSTIN, Warden; DR. BRUCE DIXON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 22, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1205 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)