From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manke v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Feb 10, 2022
No. 358782 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

358782

02-10-2022

Karl W Manke v. Dept of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs


LC No. 21-005795-AA

Stephen L. Borrello Presiding Judge, Michael J. Kelly, Judge

ORDER

Brock A. Swartzle, Judges

The motion for peremptory reversal pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(4) is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the existence of manifest error requiring reversal and warranting peremptory relief without argument or formal submission.

The application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The time for taking further steps in this appeal runs from the date of the Clerk's certification of this order. MCR 7.205(E)(3). This appeal is limited to the issues raised in the application and supporting brief. MCR 7.205(E)(4).

Borrello, P.J., would deny the motion for peremptory reversal and deny the application for leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Manke v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Feb 10, 2022
No. 358782 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Manke v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs

Case Details

Full title:Karl W Manke v. Dept of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

No. 358782 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2022)