From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manitsas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
No. C 11-2691 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-2691 PJH

11-23-2011

CELIA v. MANITSAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On June 3, 2011, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this appeal from a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. Defendant answered on October 11, 2011. According to Civil Local Rule 16-5, plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment by November 8, 2011. Plaintiff did not do so.

Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file her motion for summary judgment and to show cause regarding why she failed to file and serve her motion within fourteen days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to respond to this court's order and to file her motion, her appeal will be dismissed with prejudice with no further hearing or briefing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Manitsas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
No. C 11-2691 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Manitsas v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CELIA v. MANITSAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-2691 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)