Opinion
2:11-CV-00045-PMP-PAL.
May 9, 2011
ORDER
On May 2, 2001, the Court conducted a hearing regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint to Substitute Name of Party (Doc. #9), and Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Remand Case to Sate Court and Requiring Payment of Plaintiff's Actual Expenses and Attorney's Fees Incurred as Result of Removal (Doc.'s #10 and #11).
Having considered these fully briefed motions, and the arguments of counsel presented at the hearing, and finding that the proposed Defendant Ned Jaictin is not a necessary Defendant for the adjudication of this case, and finding further that Plaintiff's ability to obtain complete relief would not be prejudiced by excluding Ned Jaictin as a party Defendant, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint to Substitute Name of Party (Doc. #9) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Remand Case to Sate Court and Requiring Payment of Plaintiff's Actual Expenses and Attorney's Fees Incurred as Result of Removal (Doc.'s #10 and #11) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion to Strike (Doc. #29) is DENIED.