From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manifold Business and Investment, Inc. v. Wroten

Oregon Supreme Court
May 20, 1993
851 P.2d 580 (Or. 1993)

Opinion

CC A8902-00996; CA A65806; SC S39995

Argued and submitted May 5, 1993.

Decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed May 20, 1993.

In Banc

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Robert L. Kirkman, District Judge, Circuit Judge pro tempore. 116 Or. App. 573, 843 P.2d 950 (1992).

Gary Roberts, of Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.

Norman D. Malbin, Portland, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review Manifold Business and Investment, Inc.

Reuben Lenske, respondent on review pro se, argued the cause and filed a response.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Porter v. Hill, 314 Or. 86, 838 P.2d 45 (1992).


Summaries of

Manifold Business and Investment, Inc. v. Wroten

Oregon Supreme Court
May 20, 1993
851 P.2d 580 (Or. 1993)
Case details for

Manifold Business and Investment, Inc. v. Wroten

Case Details

Full title:MANIFOLD BUSINESS AND INVESTMENT, INC., an Oregon corporation, Respondent…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: May 20, 1993

Citations

851 P.2d 580 (Or. 1993)
851 P.2d 580

Citing Cases

Hedrick v. Spear

The court reasoned that paragraph (k) of the statute implicitly assumes the existence or possible existence…