From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Real Estate Equities v. Pine Equity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 2005
16 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5746N.

March 29, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered September 2, 2004, which granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.


In this action alleging breach of a noncompetition agreement made in connection with the sale by appellants of a certain segment of their business and goodwill to plaintiff, plaintiff in seeking a preliminary injunction adequately demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury in the absence of the sought relief, and a balance of the equities in its favor ( see W.T. Grant Co. v. Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517). The evidence of the breaches alleged by plaintiff was of sufficient strength to warrant a finding that plaintiff was likely to succeed on the merits, notwithstanding any triable issues raised by appellants ( see CPLR 6312 [c]; Frank May Assoc., Inc. v. Boughton, 281 AD2d 673, 675). We note as well that irreparable injury is presumed from the breach of a noncompetition agreement entered into to protect a buyer's purchase of a business and accompanying goodwill ( see Lund v. Agmata Washington Enters., Inc., 190 AD2d 577; Hay Group, Inc. v. Nadel, 170 AD2d 398, 399).

We have considered appellants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing. [ See 7 Misc 3d 1008(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51869(U) (2004).]


Summaries of

Manhattan Real Estate Equities v. Pine Equity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 2005
16 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Manhattan Real Estate Equities v. Pine Equity

Case Details

Full title:MANHATTAN REAL ESTATE EQUITIES GROUP LLC, Respondent, v. PINE EQUITY, NY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 418

Citing Cases

Valenti v. Drory

"The party seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate a probability of success on the merits, danger…

Uah-Mayfair Mgmt. Grp. v. Clark

Defendants effectively admitted to a number of violations at the evidentiary hearing.Because these covenants…