From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Railway Company v. Austen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1910
91 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1910

Decided January 25, 1910

Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolles for petitioner, appellant and respondent.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Curtis A. Peters of counsel), for defendant, respondent and appellant.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: EDWARD T. BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Manhattan Railway Company v. Austen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1910
91 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

Manhattan Railway Company v. Austen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1910

Citations

91 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1910)
91 N.E. 1117