Mangrum v. Pigue

1 Citing case

  1. Hamilton v. Jones

    132 S.W.3d 724 (Ark. 2003)   Cited 1 times
    In Hamilton v. Jones, 355 Ark. 257, 132 S.W.3d 724 (2003) (" Hamilton V"), we noted that we had ordered Mr. Kisselberg to complete the record.

    [1] A record in this case has been prepared and tendered to our clerk, but Mr. Kisselburg has not certified the record because he was not present at the reported proceedings and could not certify that the record is true and accurate. Under these circumstances, and in the interest of allowing appellant his opportunity to appeal, we direct the attorneys of record to review the record to determine what portions of the record, if any, have been omitted and to certify to the Supreme Court Clerk, by affidavit, that the record is true, accurate, and complete. See Mangrum v. Pigue, 354 Ark. 477, 125 S.W.3d 194 (2003). Upon such certification, we will accept the record.