From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangosoft, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jan 11, 2006
Civil No. 02-cv-545-SM (D.N.H. Jan. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-cv-545-SM.

January 11, 2006


ORDER


Re: (Document No. 93) Motion to Request Rulings on the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

Granted, to the extent the court of course will rule on all pending motions. Counsel will be among the first to know when rulings have been made. In the meantime, perhaps other matters might constructively occupy counsel's time, as they do the court's. To the extent the purpose of the motion is merely to inform the court that Oracle is not inclined to mediate at this point, it was unnecessary; Oracle's mediation stance has nothing at all to do with the pending motions, including when they will be resolved.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mangosoft, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jan 11, 2006
Civil No. 02-cv-545-SM (D.N.H. Jan. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Mangosoft, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Mangosoft, Inc., and Mangosoft Corporation, v. Oracle Corporation

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 02-cv-545-SM (D.N.H. Jan. 11, 2006)