From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to the first six specifications and as to the first ten words of the seventh specification named in plaintiff's reply affidavit. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the information sought is not necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) (The order denies examination of defendant before trial in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff contracting silicosis.)


Summaries of

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Company

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE MANGIONE, Appellant, v. GENERAL RAILWAY SIGNAL COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)