From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangina v. Cornelius

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 24, 1985
462 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1711.

January 24, 1985.

Thomas R. Rogers of Rogers Associates, P.A., Longwood, for petitioners.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Dean C. Kowalchyk, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.


The sworn motion and supporting affidavits seeking to disqualify respondent as trial judge in this civil action are legally sufficient. Where the motion is legally sufficient, "the judge shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged [and] shall enter an order of disqualification." Rule 1.432, Fla.R.Civ.P.; section 38.10, Florida Statutes (1983). See Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla. 1978) and State ex rel. Zacke v. Woodson, 399 So.2d 7 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) which discuss the virtually identical Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.230(d). Where the trial judge refuses to disqualify himself, prohibition is the proper remedy, Bundy, but on the basis of this opinion we assume the formal issuance of the writ will be unnecessary.

ORDERED ACCORDINGLY.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mangina v. Cornelius

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 24, 1985
462 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Mangina v. Cornelius

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MANGINA, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. LON S. CORNELIUS, JR., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 24, 1985

Citations

462 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Dep't of Children & Families

We find that the allegations in both motions to disqualify, which must be taken as true, would prompt a…

Time Warner Entertainment v. Baker

A writ of prohibition is the proper procedure for appellate review to test the validity of a motion to…